Divorce Blog: P19-308 Resources Page

Timeline:

2019-05-21: (First) PETITION FOR WRIT OF SUPERSEDEAS AND MOTION FOR EX-PARTE TEMPORARY STAY AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
2019-05-24: (Second, including Notice of Appeal) PETITION FOR WRIT OF SUPERSEDEAS AND MOTION FOR EX-PARTE TEMPORARY STAY AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
2019-05-29: COA Order on part of 5/24 Petition regarding TEMPORARY STAY:

The petition and motion filed in this cause by petitioner Andrezj (Andrew) Grodner on 24 May 2019 and designated 'Petition for Writ of Supersedeas and Motion for Ex-Parte Temporary Stay' are decided as follows: The motion for temporary stay is denied. A ruling on the petition for writ of supersedeas will be made upon the filing of a response to the petition or the expiration of the time for a response if no response is filed.

.... Miller never filed any response .....
2019-06-24: VERIFIED MOTION TO CLARIFY GATEKEEPER ORDER AND MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING
2019-06-25: COA Order on part of 5/24 Petition regarding WRIT OF SUPERSEDEAS

The petition filed in this cause by defendant Andrezj (Andrew) Grodner on 24 May 2019 and designated 'Petition for Writ of Supersedeas' is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following order: The 'Amended Order' entered by Judge Paul Hardison on 8 May 2019 is hereby stayed in part with regard to petitioner's appeal taken in file number13 CVD 398, Hunter Grodner (Summerlin) v. Andrezj (Andrew) Grodner. The Clerk of Superior Court of Pitt County shall accept for filing any documents submitted by defendant to perfect his appeal, and defendant shall be permitted to serve on opposing counsel any documents necessary to perfect his appeal. The portion of the order's decretal paragraph number nine restraining 'any communication' by defendant is also stayed. All remaining decretal provisions, including, but not limited to, those in paragraph nine restraining the service of documents or filings by defendant unrelated to defendant's appeal, are not stayed and shall be in effect during the pendency of the appeal.The petition is otherwise denied

2019-06-25: COA Order on part of 5/24 Petition regarding MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

The motion filed in this cause on the 24th of May 2019 and designated 'Motion for Extension of Time' is dismissed without prejudice to refile with a designation of which appellate timeline Defendant is seeking to extend along with a showing of good cause.

The motion filed in this cause on the 27th of June 2019 and designated 'Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record of Appeal' is dismissed without prejudice to refile with a showing that an initial thirty-day extension of time to serve the proposed record on appeal has been obtained from the trial court. N.C.R. App. P. 27(c)(1).

The motion filed in this cause on the 12th of July 2019 and designated 'Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record of Appeal' is allowed. Proposed record on appeal shall be served on or before 12 August 2019

2019-09-20: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT RESPONSE TO PROPOSED ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT OF RECORD ON APPEAL
2019-09-24: COA order on 9/20 Motion

The motion filed in this cause on the 20th of September 2019 and designated 'Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Response to Proposed Order for Settlement of Record on Appeal' is denied.

=== Docket for NCSC opened: https://www.ncappellatecourts.org/search-results.php?sDocketSearch=306P18-2&exact=1
2019-09-24: (to NCSC regarding 9/24 COA Order) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI FROM ORDER BY NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS (CASE P19-308) DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT RESPONSE TO PROPOSED ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT OF RECORD ON APPEAL