Statcounter - visit to the page

Pages visited times.

False and misleading statements by Jeffrey L. Miller (very limited selection)

This page catalogs some of the select false statements made by Pitt County attorney Jeffrey L. Miller, BAR no. 6765: (https://www.ncbar.gov/gxweb_if/wpViewMember.aspx?6765), and by no means is complete. Jeffrey L. Miller has an open invitation to respond to any and all of those statements and provide any evidence or argument he finds appropriate (email on 3/13/2019 06:34:00AM https://grodnermiller.blogspot.com/2019/03/grodner-v-grodner-13-cvd-398_13.html).
This page is updated and edited as time permits. Any comments and suggestions are welcome via the following anonymous form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd7lX-LUkkrNNZF87mdiuU6zW5ntfwUYHca9N2L21YvEGeQ4Q/viewform
(short link: https://forms.gle/uxK2tWa9S3pV7cn37)









  • 2019-09-17, hearing in front of Judge Paul Hardison (see official recording: https://grodnerdivorce.blogspot.com/2019/09/court-hearing-officia'l-recording-of.html)
    • False Statement:
      • "[Mr. Grodner] has not responded in any way" to Mr. Miller's Objections.
        (audio: at 9:32:10am)
    • Explanation:
    • ============================  
    • False Statement:
      • "I have not received a copy of the transcript from Mr. Grodner as part of the record or from court reporter in any fashion" (audio: at 9:36:36am) "[Mr. Grodner] continues to talk about some kind of email knowing that I told him not to email me and so his emails are not service of anything (...) So I don't know what he is talking about, what I should have. I represent to the court that I have not seen verbatim transcript, he did not serve the verbatim transcript." (audio: at 9:37:17am)
    • Explanation
      • Mr. Miller received an email from court reporter telling him that the transcript is ready and that he should contact court reporter to get it - it is at the bottom of filed email to Judge Hardison: https://grodnerdivorce.blogspot.com/2019/09/filed-email-communication-to-judge.html. Later during the hearing Mr. Miller actually filed as evidence the email that he received but also misrepresented its content because it says that he should contact court reporter to get it and certificate of service says that he actually got it, so it is his responsibility to contact court reporter.
    • ============================
    • Misleading the court - in that discussion Mr. Miller is representing to the court that I am somehow supposed to serve him with the transcript.
    • ============================
    • Misleading Statement:
      • "There is nothing that authorize [Mr. Grodner] to serve me by email." (audio: at 9:42:52am)
    • Explanation:
      • Mr. Miller tried to respond to accusation that he made false statement that he does not have to communicate with me by email but when the Court of Appeals Stayed part of Gatekeeper Order then 16 December 2016 Order was in effect I could communicate with me ONLY via email. So this is between a lie and misleading statement but it is hard to deny that Mr. Miller knows how he is trying to mislead the Judge.





  
  • 2019-03-10, email at 07:23:00 PM, statements in proposed Order (http://grodnerdivorce.blogspot.com/2019/03/official-document-proposed-order-send.html)
    • ==================
    • False statements:
      • (Jeffrey L. Miller proposed by FINDING OF FACT (55)) (...) "Other than the Defendant's persistent personal statement that Mr. Miller was a liar, the Defendant presented no evidence to support his statements or claims or to support to any entitlement to any form of relief. The exhibits presented by Defendant do not prove that Mr. Miller made any false representations or statements to this or any other Court. (...) There is no evidence Mr. Miller lied to anyone or had ex parte contact with Judge Teague. The evidence indicates that the Court finds Mr. Miller did not lie or make misrepresentations to the Court and he did not have ex parte contact with Judge Teague."
    • Explanation
          MR. GRODNER:  So, if I can just for the record make a statement that this (inaudible) that this Court is aware that Mr. Miller is lying and ---
          THE COURT: No, sir, you can’t make that statement because you cannot speak for the Court. So you cannot make that statement.
          MR. GRODNER: I have presented evidence that Mr. Miller is lying and this Court is allowing the hearing to proceed even with the evidence of Mr. Lit – Wit – Miller ---
          THE COURT:   Excuse me, sir. You - you can’t make that statement. You can only understand that this Court has denied your motion to continue and you can appeal it to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. And we’re now proceeding with Rule 59 motion. Let’s proceed.








  • (todo) 2017-?-?? motion and hearing about stay of due to appeal. "Motion suggesting ... ""



  • (todo) 201?-?-?? hearing in front of Judge Braddy, about mental record, Miller said that he did not review but he earlier admitted that he did. Also lied that there was ever seal. Judge Braddy also lied that he sealed it.

  • (todo) 2014-8-26 hearing in front of Judge Braddy, custody matter, about mental record of Plaintiff. Miller said that record is irrelevant and that he sees nothing importnant in it.

No comments:

Post a Comment